![jump ultimate stars chat room jump ultimate stars chat room](https://gbatemp.net/data/avatars/l/109/109333.jpg)
Is having a sandwich or reading a book or chatting better or worse than shuffling the track order?Įxhilarating because, as someone who is involved in the making of TV shows, it had never occurred to me that there was anything you could do about how your stuff gets consumed. I’ve never sat down and listened to a whole album all the way through, as if I’m watching a film but with no pictures or talking. Christmas carols while decorating a Christmas tree or… actually that’s basically it. I sometimes have music on but always while doing other things at the same time. Intimidating because I’m a musical philistine and have never listened to an album properly. I found this both intimidating and exhilarating. “Our art tells a story and our stories should be listened to as we intended,” she said. This will make it harder for them to listen to the songs in a different sequence from the one intended by an album’s creators. I just think it should be about the music.”īut is not listening to the album better or worse than listening to it in the wrong order? It was announced last week that, in response to a request from Adele, Spotify will no longer give a “shuffle” option when people are listening to albums. “This is the ridiculous situation they’ve put us in, Adele. This is his chance to shop all those haughty suits to Adele herself. Not having noticed the email giving him access, he might have assumed that he wasn’t allowed to listen to it yet. I wonder if there wasn’t a slight petulance in his honesty, not directed at Adele but at her surrounding team and the self-important heightened security that executives love to introduce to creative launches. So he can say that’s his favourite! He’s got something to talk about! He’d be fine! Also, and here’s the clincher, he had heard one song from it, Easy on Me. There’s a high chance he wouldn’t get found out and, if he did, he’d still be no worse off than he is now. OK, fair point, but what if there weren’t? Adele’s on a tight schedule – she’ll have another interview coming up two minutes later. “But what if there were follow-up questions?” you may be thinking.
![jump ultimate stars chat room jump ultimate stars chat room](https://images-wixmp-ed30a86b8c4ca887773594c2.wixmp.com/intermediary/f/3cf2b4ae-28f4-4f6d-bb8d-5c20d0a6bd35/d64zo80-c37b9001-a294-49ad-ac27-1e6a0db79236.jpg)
She’s not going to go: “Ha ha! Got you! You can’t have listened to it because, if you had, you’d know that it’s shit!” Tell her that her album is great and she will believe you have listened to it. I’m sure she’s afflicted with a reasonable amount of creative self-doubt, but she wouldn’t be a big star if she didn’t also reckon she’s pretty good at music. I am always doing other things at the same timeĪlso, it is impossible to conceive of a lie less likely to be exposed than him telling Adele that he’d enjoyed listening to her album. I’m a musical philistine and have never listened to an album properly. Listening to it is not going to meaningfully inform his answer to the question. He is a contracted staff member of Team Adele’s New Album Is Great. There’s probably no space for him to think it’s not great. There is no space for him to say it’s not great. He’s been selected to do his country’s only interview with Adele about her album. Whether he’d loved it or hated it or not known what to make of it, he would have said it was great. He should have said: “I thought it was great.” That’s what he’d have said if he’d listened to it. But it should have been the moment of lying. But then Adele understandably asked: “What do you think of my album?” He’d done most of the interview, without mentioning the album, and it had seemingly gone fine. But was that really the big mistake? I accept that, ideally, he’d have checked his email and had a listen, but I don’t think that omission made his situation hopeless.
![jump ultimate stars chat room jump ultimate stars chat room](https://help.blackboard.com/sites/default/files/images/2020-12/collab_moderator_chat_profanity_filter.png)
The mistake he made, he has subsequently confessed, was failing to notice an email giving him pre-release access to the album, which at the time of the interview was not yet generally available. As a result, Sony will not release the interview footage and the big exclusive deal that Doran’s employer, Channel Seven, struck with Adele’s team, at a reported cost of A$1m (more than £500,000), is ruined. He’s the guy who screwed up the Australian media’s big interview with Adele by admitting he hadn’t listened to her new album. I suspect he’s currently discovering quite how many people on the internet suffer from that condition.
![jump ultimate stars chat room jump ultimate stars chat room](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/tW1QIvlFbmI/hqdefault.jpg)
Y ou’d have to be chronically deficient in empathy not to feel sorry for Australian TV reporter Matt Doran.